The Nano Cortex VS the Kemper Profiler Player for Monitoring through a Cabinet
Comparing and Reviewing the Nano Cortex against the Kemper Profiler Player for monitory through a cabinet in the room.
#Nano #Cortex #Kemper #Profiler #Player #Monitoring #Cabinet
Originally posted by UC-7EI0fphafcdyJ6gVi_m6Q at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPQ0_McS1R4
Sorry to all the Nano Cortex FanBoys down voting this video…I'm happy you like your Nano???? It sounded bad through my setup, not much else to say????♂
I've got the Nano Cortex and a Kemper Profiler. I agree with your assessment of the NC for the most part, but I will point out that a lot of that brightness can be tamed by using the right cab simulation. My main gripe about the NC isn't the sound, but the workflow and the ecosphere which just isn't up to the Kemper's.
The Kemper sounds a lot better, more natural. Thanks for the comparison.
Sorry to hear that the nano hasn't worked out for you. Both the Kemper and the Nano sound great. I've played the Kemper toaster for years through a cab with v30s at home and iem with my band. To be honest I did struggle to get it to sound good through a guitar cab. I now run a Nano through a hotone stage hooked up to a frfr speaker at home and it sounds great. I'm guessing these units just sound best through a frfr speaker. You just happen to have more luck with player in your setup.
Hello, sir what is your opinion on nano cortex + full range speaker it's better? or not. thank you..
Kemper Liquid Profiling is actually the newest most advanced technology…and Leo Gibson proved it in his Nano QC vs Kemper video.
When comparing a Capture he made and a Liquid PROFILE he made of his Marshall, when using the Gain and EQ controls on both units the Liquid Profile was 18% more accurate to his Marshall than the Nano QC…he was stunned.
I predict Kemper will add the Profiling capability to the Player and it will be free.
Guitarists fall for the hype about the Kemper being "old technology".
It's an algorithm, the power of the chip is irrelevant, it depends how the algorithm was created, and Christophe Kemper just happens to be smarter than the competing engineers…and that's why the Kemper sounds and feels better than the Axe-FX, the QC and the ToneX.
Besides the fact that the Kemper FX are brilliant.
Try the Spring Reverb, you won't find a better digital SR on the market.
The Fuzz system is genius, the Delays and Reverbs and the new Tremelos are brilliant.
I think the kemper sounds better. I have the nano and like it through my amps effects return. I hate irs, none of them sound like my 57 in front of my cab.
cCortex to me sounded better but I keep the kemper
I have a Hotone Loudster and the H&K 112 with the V30, what a coincidence i am looking at KPP and nano cortex comparison and sounds from a real cab, let alone the same exact cab and power amp too????