Saturday, November 9, 2024
GuitarGuitar Effects

Tonex vs. N.A.M BLIND TEST RESULTS!


#tonex #neuralampmodeler #tonexpedal
Line 6 Marketplace Presets: https://bit.ly/line6marketplace-sadites
Helix Ultimate Complete Presets Vol. 1-7: https://bit.ly/3xuAD30 (NEW)
Helix Ultimate Complete Presets Vol. 1-6: https://bit.ly/3IRjVwz
Tonex Tone Models: https://bit.ly/tonexpresets
Tonex ToneNet Tone Models: https://bit.ly/3JosdwY
Quad Cortex Presets & Captures: https://bit.ly/4dFDG92
N.A.M (Neural Amp Modeler) Tone Collections: https://bit.ly/3SOXyhx
Kemper Rigs/Profiles: https://bit.ly/3shWRTe
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvhdK4-QIzo76Y_RIbxZctg/join

In this video I reveal the results of the blind test I did comparing Tonex and N.A.M. I also take this opportunity to showcase some new tone model/captures based on my incredible Suhr SL67 amp. I hope you enjoy the tone models/captures and the video!

Tonex Sir Plex BB Ultimate Tone Models: https://bit.ly/3MknEFd
N.A.M Sir Plex BB Ultimate Captures: https://bit.ly/3Mmv9eM
N.A.M Sir Plex 67 DI Ultimate Captures: https://bit.ly/4cI24Fj

As always, thanks so much for watching…

Please visit my sponsors:

Line 6: http://www.line6.com
Vigier Guitars: http://www.vigierguitars.com
Toontrack: http://www.toontrack.com
Mission Engineering: www.missionengineering.com
Morningstar FX: http://www.morningstarfx.com
Temple Audio: http://www.templeaudio.com

0:00 – Introduction
2:14 – Tone Model/Capture Explanation
2:58 – Tonex Sir Plex BB Ultimate Tone Models: How They Sound
7:02 – N.A.M Sir Plex BB Ultimate Captures: How They Sound
9:49 – N.A.M Sir Plex 67 DI Ultimate Captures: How They Sound
13:02 – Blind Test Results Reveal
15:00 – Conclusion
15:54 – Tonex Sir Plex BB In The Mix
17:34 – N.A.M Sir Plex BB In The Mix

#Tonex #N.A.M #BLIND #TEST #RESULTS

Originally posted by UCvhdK4-QIzo76Y_RIbxZctg at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6N7rCWjbIY

12 thoughts on “Tonex vs. N.A.M BLIND TEST RESULTS!

  • Wohoo, I was so sure about it and was right :-))… As I said after the blindtest: When you listen to the high frequencies, it is quite obvious who is who. I am very much into the studiogear profiles like Studer and Neve and for those it is quite important to have that high frequency content as close as possible.

    Reply
  • Say even though they sound the same or close I would still go with tonex for the support behind it. But having NAM along with Tonex don't hurt.

    Reply
  • The NAM is monstrous! I’ve the pre amp from tech 21 Steve Harris and I tried a profile in that a found in tonehunt, ITS THE SAME SOUND

    Reply
  • In terms of playing live what will make or break these for me is whomever had the best parametric EQ

    Reply
  • Glad my studio monitors and ears where good enough to pick out B as more close to the amp, but agree you could use either in context of a mix and be perfectly fine though I still lean toward real amp when I have one.

    Reply
  • Haha! Nailed it. Although i forgot to say which was which. I just preferred A

    Reply
  • I guessed correctly, but is was very close, both sounded good and usable. All the top Profiling and Modelling platforms are so good these days it doesn't matter much which you use. I kind of feel the "tone obsession" thing is pretty well played out. Thanks

    Reply
  • Well, that's fascinating. I got it wrong, but that's because I assumed the clip that sounded the closest must have been NAM. You just made me happier with my Tonex!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *